<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All distinctions human beings are able to make&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/</link>
	<description>feeding your inner rebel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael@ Awareness * Connection</title>
		<link>http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael@ Awareness * Connection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/2007/11/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make.html#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Put me down for a more scientific approach. To me the What the Bleep Do We Know uses a couple of the few scientists they could scare up for their piece. There was one scientist in there that plainly opposes the way they portrayed his views. The wikipedia article on it explains acadmia&#039;s general reaction to it. It was filmed in my hometown by the way.

Your post hits on an interesting philosophical question.

&lt;abbr&gt;Michael@ Awareness * Connection&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://enjoyparenting.blogspot.com/2008/08/hamsterbilities.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hamsterbilities: Preparing Kids for Responsibilty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Put me down for a more scientific approach. To me the What the Bleep Do We Know uses a couple of the few scientists they could scare up for their piece. There was one scientist in there that plainly opposes the way they portrayed his views. The wikipedia article on it explains acadmia&#8217;s general reaction to it. It was filmed in my hometown by the way.</p>
<p>Your post hits on an interesting philosophical question.</p>
<p><abbr>Michael@ Awareness * Connection&#8217;s last blog post..<a href="http://enjoyparenting.blogspot.com/2008/08/hamsterbilities.html" rel="nofollow">Hamsterbilities: Preparing Kids for Responsibilty</a></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lodewijkvdb</title>
		<link>http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijkvdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/2007/11/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make.html#comment-594</guid>
		<description>Wow, there are a lot of ideas in your comment Stephen!

There seems to be a distinction between the sense of touch and the sense of position/orientation you describe. However it&#039;s a very subtle one. If the sense of touch is related to the skin and the nerves beneath it, things like soft/hard, dull/sharp, warm/cold, coarse/smooth and so on come to mind. But balance is not controlled by that part. It is controlled (or measured?) in the inner ear, but felt in other parts of the body. Yet we can feel warmth by touching something, but we can also experience warmth as a wholebody experience. I think both are part of the kinesthetic sense. The sense of touch is a part of it, as is balance.

What you describe as intuition, a subconscious ability to correlate seemingly unrelated inputs, sounds plausible to me. The examples you give are great examples of one of the brain&#039;s abilities: Nexting. I read about this in Daniel Gilbert&#039;s book Stumbling on Happiness. Nexting is a mode in our brain that predicts what is going to happen next. But most animals can do that too. But Nexting and Intuition are not necessarily the same I think. Need to think about that some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, there are a lot of ideas in your comment Stephen!</p>
<p>There seems to be a distinction between the sense of touch and the sense of position/orientation you describe. However it&#8217;s a very subtle one. If the sense of touch is related to the skin and the nerves beneath it, things like soft/hard, dull/sharp, warm/cold, coarse/smooth and so on come to mind. But balance is not controlled by that part. It is controlled (or measured?) in the inner ear, but felt in other parts of the body. Yet we can feel warmth by touching something, but we can also experience warmth as a wholebody experience. I think both are part of the kinesthetic sense. The sense of touch is a part of it, as is balance.</p>
<p>What you describe as intuition, a subconscious ability to correlate seemingly unrelated inputs, sounds plausible to me. The examples you give are great examples of one of the brain&#8217;s abilities: Nexting. I read about this in Daniel Gilbert&#8217;s book Stumbling on Happiness. Nexting is a mode in our brain that predicts what is going to happen next. But most animals can do that too. But Nexting and Intuition are not necessarily the same I think. Need to think about that some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @Stephen</title>
		<link>http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>@Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/2007/11/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make.html#comment-597</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I have been under the impression that the sense of touch was distinct from the kinesthetic sense - which was described to me as being more the sense of body position/orientation, which makes it a &quot;sixth&quot; sense. I am also a believer in &quot;intuition&quot; which a very smart man once told me was a sub-conscious ability to correlate seemingly un-related inputs into a synthetic gestalt. There are simple examples of this, such as being able to catch a thrown object (which involves fairly complex differential equations to teach a computer how to do it!) and more complicated examples such as recognizing repeating patterns in complex arrangements (music, numbers, letters, tiles on a mosaic, etc) or predicting the behavior of an individual in a particular situation.

As for &quot;extra-sensory perception&quot;, our planet is awash in electro-magnetic energy from a variety of sources in the solar system. There are large areas of the human brain that seem to be &quot;un-used&quot; most of the time. It is a certainty that our bodies and minds are able to distinguish variations in this field, but this particular sense is overshadowed by the much more powerful and immediate &quot;concrete&quot; senses in the traditional count. The ancient Chinese art of acupuncture comes to mind as an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I have been under the impression that the sense of touch was distinct from the kinesthetic sense &#8211; which was described to me as being more the sense of body position/orientation, which makes it a &#8220;sixth&#8221; sense. I am also a believer in &#8220;intuition&#8221; which a very smart man once told me was a sub-conscious ability to correlate seemingly un-related inputs into a synthetic gestalt. There are simple examples of this, such as being able to catch a thrown object (which involves fairly complex differential equations to teach a computer how to do it!) and more complicated examples such as recognizing repeating patterns in complex arrangements (music, numbers, letters, tiles on a mosaic, etc) or predicting the behavior of an individual in a particular situation.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;extra-sensory perception&#8221;, our planet is awash in electro-magnetic energy from a variety of sources in the solar system. There are large areas of the human brain that seem to be &#8220;un-used&#8221; most of the time. It is a certainty that our bodies and minds are able to distinguish variations in this field, but this particular sense is overshadowed by the much more powerful and immediate &#8220;concrete&#8221; senses in the traditional count. The ancient Chinese art of acupuncture comes to mind as an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lodewijkvdb</title>
		<link>http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>Lodewijkvdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/2007/11/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make.html#comment-595</guid>
		<description>I did see the movie What the Bleep. &#039;Down the rabbit hole&#039; is the extended version I think, and I haven&#039;t seen that one yet. But I definitely have to see the movie again, it made quite an impact already and I&#039;ll be watching with different eyes now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did see the movie What the Bleep. &#8216;Down the rabbit hole&#8217; is the extended version I think, and I haven&#8217;t seen that one yet. But I definitely have to see the movie again, it made quite an impact already and I&#8217;ll be watching with different eyes now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://beanoriginal.net/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 19:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lodewijkvdb.com/2007/11/all-distinctions-human-beings-are-able-to-make.html#comment-596</guid>
		<description>Hi Lodewijk,

Have you seen the movie What the Bleep - Down the rabbithole? This movies hints at some scientific explanations for things such as telepathy and precognition.

Personally I found this movie very complementary to &#039;the secret&#039;, which was a bit too magical to my taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lodewijk,</p>
<p>Have you seen the movie What the Bleep &#8211; Down the rabbithole? This movies hints at some scientific explanations for things such as telepathy and precognition.</p>
<p>Personally I found this movie very complementary to &#8216;the secret&#8217;, which was a bit too magical to my taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
